X

Looks like you are a new visitor to this site. Hello!

Welcome to Hope For Film! Come participate in the discussion, and I encourage you to enter your email address in the sidebar and subscribe. It's free! And easy! If you have any suggestions on how to improve this website or suggestions for topics please don't hesitate to write in to any of the blogs.

You can also follow me on Twitter or Facebook.

(If you keep getting this message, you probably have cookies turned off.)

May 25 at 8:30am

Film Gigging: Towards A Lo-Fi Film Circuit

By Ted Hope

Today’s guest post is by John Bradburn.

Why do kids make music and not films? It’s a right of passage for teenagers up and down the land to jump in a van and travel the length of the country with instruments to play shows. These same kids save up to buy guitars and record demos. They may not make a profit but they enjoy the ride. I want to know why this doesn’t happen with filmmakers. What are the barriers to grassroots film exhibition or Film Gigging and what can we learn from the model most bands work on?

Kids don’t make films. For the cost of a set of instruments you could buy a digital camera and a laptop. Four people can make a film quite easily and with the same level of technological skill needed to record and mix a demo. But kids don’t. Jean Cocteau famously stated that film would only be an art when its materials were as cheap as pen and paper. Well now it’s certainly as cheap as an Ibenez guitar.

The film industry looks like the music industry if we thought we could only record songs with orchestras in the Albert Hall. There is no lo-fi film circuit. There are small budget shorts but 95% are aiming at the mainstream. There are even less film ‘labels’ that fund and distribute films like albums. CDs and DVDs are physically the same. If you can get an album reviewed you can get a film reviewed. So logically there should be an equal amount of indie film labels as there are music labels.

The issue is not with the availability of ‘cinemas’ and lets be clear a cinema is just any old space that can screen a film. Most bars have a big screen projector, speakers and a DVD. Sure there are short film evenings but they work on a different level. Films are frequently chosen by a selector and then screened in a micro festival model. Crucially the money generally goes to the exhibitor not the filmmaker. This would be like paying Glastonbury £90 to listen to your demo on the hope of being selected.

I am trying a different model. I am taking my feature – Wrists – to small venues around the UK in a film-gigging model. I’m taking the film to any screen that will show it where ever that is. I’d even love to be invited to someone’s house and show it to a group of friends. After the screening I’ll sell some DVDs of Wrists or some of my other films. This is entirely possible because it’s a small film for a small audience (It cost about £2, 000 and was shot with a crew of 3). I believe that if your film has a small audience then you should make it for a small amount of money. Reinvest your profits and then continue as any band would.

Much of the influence for this comes from the DIY punk and hardcore music scene. In the 1980s Dischord Records started releasing the bands from Washington DC area. They did everything themselves and released the albums at affordable prices because their overheads were low. They looked at the technology and the audience and worked out a profitable cost structure. They did not look to the received wisdom of the industry (which is currently destroying EMI ). This route is simple but it is a lot of hard work for slow and modest rewards. But you will enjoy the ride.

The 80s hardcore scene made famous the phrase ‘the personal is political.” I worry that our current film industry squeezes out marginal voices because of the perceived cost of filmmaking. Filmmakers feel less empowered to experiment or be honest in their films. I fear that most of the filmmakers we see need acceptance – to be chosen for a festival or given a job in the industry. The perception of cost makes investors always go for the safer or more mainstream or more like what has happened before type product. Technology has now leveled this playing field.

We need a paradigm shift in our thoughts as filmmakers. We are not ‘directors’ or ‘producers’ we are filmmakers who need to own their film, tour their film, sell their film and find their audience. Filmmakers should ask themselves what technology do I really need and what crew is essential to its operation.

Bands are technical – they play their instruments. Films are frequently divided in to talent and technicians. This is illogical and stupid and raises the cost exponentially. If you have an idea to make a film have the passion to learn how to use a camera. Just like kids playing shows and living in the back of a van. Guitarists get better by playing guitar and filmmakers get better by making films not waiting for them to happen. And yes the glamour of the film industry may probably have to go.

This project is aimed to open up a debate about what we expect from film – does it need to be so bloated and only exist in a cinema? Even ‘art-house’ takes on budgets that are beyond the imagination of most people. I argue that this is only through received wisdom rather than looking at the facts of what technology is available, what film you want to make and how to connect with that audience.

Much of the impetus for this idea came from working as the DOP on the 72 Hour Feature project that came out of Staffordshire University’s Digital Film Production Research team. This experience of shooting, editing and screening a feature in 72 hours showed me more than anything that we should look at the evidence of how a film is possible rather than decades old assumptions. And I fear these assumptions are the only barriers to grass routes film exhibition.
You can see more details on Wrists at wristsfilm.blogspot.com

You can read more about the 72 Hour Film Project at www.72hourmovie.com
You can email me on j.p.bradburn@googlemail.com if you have any comments or want to book a screening. It’s free in the UK by the way.

John Bradburn is a filmmaker, journalist and lecturer at Staffordshire University in Film Production Technology. His no budget feature Kyle played in the 2007 Seattle International Film Festival, West County Festival Los Angeles and Flatpack UK. His research interests include new distribution models, digital film language and DIY Aesthetics.

  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print

114 Comments

leave a comment
  1. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    Aw, this was an extremely nice post. Taking a few minutes and actual effort to produce a top notch article… but what can I say… I put things off a whole lot and never seem to get nearly anything done.

  2. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    I’m impressed, I have to admit. Seldom do I come across a blog that’s equally educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. The problem is something too few men and women are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy I came across this in my hunt for something regarding this.

  3. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    Next time I read a blog, Hopefully it does not fail me as much as this particular one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, nonetheless I genuinely thought you would probably have something useful to say. All I hear is a bunch of crying about something that you could possibly fix if you weren’t too busy searching for attention.

  4. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    After I initially commented I seem to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on each time a comment is added I recieve four emails with the exact same comment. Perhaps there is an easy method you can remove me from that service? Thanks!

  5. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Thank you so much, However I am going through troubles with your RSS. I don’t understand why I cannot subscribe to it. Is there anybody else having identical RSS problems? Anyone who knows the answer can you kindly respond? Thanx!!

  6. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesn’t disappoint me as much as this particular one. I mean, Yes, it was my choice to read through, nonetheless I really thought you would have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of crying about something that you could fix if you were not too busy seeking attention.

  7. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    Great blog you have got here.. It’s hard to find good quality writing like yours these days. I seriously appreciate people like you! Take care!!

  8. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    I blog frequently and I seriously appreciate your information. Your article has truly peaked my interest. I am going to take a note of your blog and keep checking for new information about once per week. I opted in for your Feed as well.

  9. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    I’m amazed, I have to admit. Rarely do I come across a blog that’s both equally educative and entertaining, and without a doubt, you’ve hit the nail on the head. The problem is something too few men and women are speaking intelligently about. Now i’m very happy I found this during my hunt for something relating to this.

  10. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    This website was… how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I’ve found something which helped me. Cheers!

  11. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    Having read this I thought it was very informative. I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this short article together. I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  12. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    May I simply say what a comfort to discover somebody who actually knows what they are talking about on the internet. You actually know how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More people need to check this out and understand this side of your story. I can’t believe you aren’t more popular given that you most certainly have the gift.

  13. www / May 25 at 8:30am

    You’re so awesome! I don’t suppose I’ve truly read through a single thing like that before. So nice to find someone with a few genuine thoughts on this subject matter. Really.. thank you for starting this up. This website is one thing that is needed on the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

  14. my review here / May 25 at 8:30am

    You really make it seem really easy together with your presentation but I to find this topic to be really one thing which I believe I would by no means understand. It seems too complex and extremely extensive for me. I’m taking a look ahead on your next post, I’ll try to get the grasp of it!|

Leave a Comment

This site could not have been built without the help and insight of Michael Morgenstern. My thanks go out to him.

Help save indie film and give this guy a job in web design or film!