March 21 at 7:42am

Lipsky’s Indiewire List on Why He Loves Theatrical Distro

Cassavettes’ former distributor announced last week that he was going back to his old ways and taking other people’s films to the people. This week he (Jeff Lipsky) did a must read article to try to explain why. It’s in the pop form of a list and after each bullet point he goes into some detail to back up his assertion. Check it out. I post the list (w/o the explanation) below.

There is some food for thought in Jeff’s positions and I look forward to discussing it further. I have always believed in a collective sub-conscious; is there really a new? In reading, Jeff’s list it reminded me of several points from filmmaker Michael Barnard, who’s thoughts on the current state I am posting today and tomorrow. Stay tuned…

The whole article is on IndieWire and you should read it. Jeff’s bulletpoints are:

1) My number one job as a distributor-for-hire is to run a collection agency.

2) All new distribution platforms (with the possible quirky exception of movie downloads to laptops and PDAs) fall under the heading of “home entertainment.” And, one after another, they all tend to cannibalize each other.
3) According to an article in Reuters, in 2009 combined theatrical and DVD sales/rentals in the US yielded $26 billion.

4) We should be talking about how to capture the attention of a film’s potential theatrical audience (which is hungrier than ever) while being able to reduce the marketing spend.

5) Approach domestic film festivals with great caution.

6) From the Everything Old is New Again Department: Addict teens, get them into the habit of going to see independent films, to debate them, to spread word-of-mouth, to love them.

7) What do I make of the state of film criticism today and how do I assess its role in the distribution of movies right now?

8) What about the state and role of trade media? Do we need a trade media at all?

9) I’m not in denial about technology.

10) I do believe in social networking…

11) I want to continue to distribute films theatrically because I still love movies.

As with all online publishing these days, the comments make for necessary reading.  In this instance, Chris Dorr, who says:

A very good post. A couple of ideas to amplify.

Numbers 9 and 10. The innovation that is occurring in technology today often takes place in what some call the “golden triangle”, the three sides being mobile, social and real time. The three poster children for this innovation are Apple, Facebook and Twitter, however, the innovation extends far beyond each of them. Each side of the triangle drives the other.

As a result the internet for many, (though not all) exists in the physical world. It is now something to which you are constantly connected while you move about in the real world. As a result you are connected to your social graph and to the choices you and your friends make and recommend as they move through the world. These choices include things like restaurants, music venues and yes—movie theaters.

Every aspect of the innovation within the “golden triangle” enhances the possibility of independent movies reaching their audiences in a theatrical release at a radically lower cost. It is only a matter of independent filmmakers and their distributors truly understanding this innovation and harnessing it .

So don’t deny this technology or ignore it—dive in, understand it and embrace it. There are real people and yes, even real money here.

  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Ryan
    One thing I'd like to touch on is Lipsky's desire to find 'local' film-reviewers. He later goes on to say that he is not in denial about technology. I respect what he's done greatly, and think he's got a lot to offer, but I think he may be a bit out of touch in regard to this point. You would be hard pressed to find people under 30 who look 'locally' for a film review. They are going online, and they are reading reviews by the sites and friends they trust. The internet is all about convenience. Most of the time, it is a site they are using to check movie times, or a site they go to for news (yahoo does both) - or a site they go to because it relates to who they are as individuals (BoingBoing will sometimes post a review of a book and you will see sales spike immediately after) - Either way, the world is increasingly shrinking...

    I do agree that there need to be more (and stronger) reviewers, but they need to be more niche - not more local. Young people don't care if Roger Ebert gives a movie a thumbs up. If they are an athlete and are reading ESPN on a daily basis for updates - then they are relating more to the films that Bill Simmons is reviewing. And he's an older guy who's not even really reviewing films. Imagine if they had a film review column? If you are into hip-hop music and you to go a hip-hop site for daily updates, you'd be more inclined to read the reviews on that site because, ideally, the readers relate to the reviewer on a daily basis.
blog comments powered by Disqus

This site could not have been built without the help and insight of Michael Morgenstern. My thanks go out to him.

Help save indie film and give this guy a job in web design or film!