September 17 at 12:18pm

18 Actions Towards A Sustainable Truly Free Film Community

I promised the Twitterverse this list a few weeks back. Life gets in the way of completing things though. I eventually hope to have more than a draft for you, but I also hope it won’t be necessary. I initially thought this was just a top ten list, and maybe it should have been. I already know I have left important things off this list though, and here I am at eighteen.

Having already left home before I hit such a mark, it seems fit this list does likewise. The comfort of the nest is part of the problem and its time to get the conversation started. And like so many things, with this list it is not about the size, but about the intensity with which we engage with each element. I wish I could give marching orders instead of discussion points. I wrote this to encourage but you can use it as a litmus test for whether you really want an independent and diverse culture or not. What are these are you doing? What of these are you willing to do?

The time is now. If we don’t fully own the absolute necessity to change how we’ve all been working, we won’t be working — and we won’t have the illuminating, inspiring, transforming films that we now enjoy. It’s your choice, but action is required.

There is the capacity for many more of us to create and prosper from creative media work. This capacity can also close up and vanish along with our audiences. The canaries are now the size of Big Birds and we somehow are able to ignore them (but that is a subject for a different posts).

SO YOU SAY YOU WANT A SUSTAINABLE & TRULY FREE FILM COMMUNITY AND CULTURE? Time to take some action.

Mentor – if you have been working in the film industry for at least five years, you certainly have the knowledge to help lift somebody else up. Ideally this would be someone from a much different background than yourself (more on that later) so things don’t have to stay the same. That said, those that you lift up will also carry on some of your knowledge, so the bonds that need to be strengthened hopefully will be.

Curate- You got into this business because you loved film, maybe you even always loved talking about films, but what do you do now to help spread the love? Friends and family are the best influencers in terms of getting others to see films, and there won’t be any business unless we keep people going to the movies. Whether its as simple as getting friends over on the weekend to watch something they wouldn’t normally have, using a social network tool to get a large group out and into the theaters, blogging about the things you think are essential, or forming a film club and actually booking films you love, there’s something you could be doing to get work you love seen and appreciated. There are over 6000 films made a year; it’s overwhelming. You have to become the filter for your friends, family, and followers. Tell them what you love, share it. And there are many alternatives that sending around that link where you found that others labors are now being bootlegged.

Provide- info, advice, access – Industries all go through cycles and it may have once benefited some folks who got established early to limit what others could know or get to do, but those days ended. It is changing too fast and yesterday’s discovery is old news pretty damn fast. Our future depends on innovation and unity; sharing what you know and have are the most likely ways for each to occur. If you learn something, pass it on. Post it. Tweet it. Discuss it.

Learn/Evolve- Everyone likes to quote William Goldman’s line about the movie industry, but it has never been truer that no one knows anything now. The ways films were financed & sold for the last fifteen years are no longer do-able. Audiences don’t consume the way they used to. There is no acquisition market and no business model has emerged for earning significant revenue on the internet. People have been convinced that hardware should be expensive whereas content should be free (i.e. creators have become the advertisers for the manufacturers). We have the tools to build a new model but our ability to use them is rather limited. It’s time to try new things and if you aren’t learning new things on a regular basis you might as well admit defeat now. Build experimentation into your daily regime, into your business plan.

Migrate – Although this is close to “Learn/Evolve”, migration is a specific form thereof. As much as we need to strengthen the net, we have to extend our web’s reach. We have to both give and take. Cinema requires a global awareness and participation. Specificity is universal. You aren’t just making your work for friends and family, unless it is the Family Of Man (to borrow an inaccurate phrase). Travel and source. Bring it back home. Give it away. Extend your reach and modify your inputs, but cross borders. It is a global community and the more we embrace that, the stronger we will be.

Aim Higher With Content Quality -For years the movie business flourished because not enough material was available. Now everything is there for the viewing when you want it, where you want it, and how you want it. As a filmmaker today you are competing against everything that came before you. Yet also as a filmmaker you have the benefit of having access to all of film history that has preceded you. You get to see what others have done, but you have to take it one step further. Since you can no longer win by getting there first, you have no choice but to try to do it better.

Aim Higher With Narrative Structure & Ambitions – It’s not enough to have a good story well told anymore. Cinema is over one hundred years old and stories can’t just have a beginning, a middle, or an end. Our films won’t survive if they are dependent on a single author to deliver them or don’t inspire others to deliver them. Take back what has always been yours and embrace the other aspects of filmmaking beyond content and production. There are many points of access to a story and many reasons to return to the world, but we have not been utilizing them.

Introduce- We have to knit this net a whole lot stronger. If your friends are stronger, you are stronger. One persons success does not limit yours, but quite the opposite — it enhances your position. You have to work to get your team further down the field. It takes more than an army to create, promote, market, distribute, and appreciate good work. If you are not providing introductions to those that you know who will benefit by knowing the other ones you know, you asking to play a game solo when everyone else will be be fielding battalions.

Make Different, Make Strange & Change- Does it ever feel to you that half the films that get made are remakes but they don’t know it? Or that everyone is preaching to the converted but they forgot what the sermon was about? Or maybe that they long ago stopped looking for the real sky and were content to keep going as long as the treadmill was moving? Once I had a friend come to me with so much urgency asking “Don’t they get it? Our job is to make them want to be over there, farther away from here, aspiring for something better, feeling the hope that they can get there.” He was right, but we aren’t going to do it by repeating what has been done before.

Ignore – There are many in the film business who are never going to help you. Many of these will never help you even after you have helped them. The sooner you identify these folks and stop wasting your time with them, the better off you are going to be. We have to much to do to bother with them, no matter how powerful they may be, how smart or creative they may be, or how much they appear to have to offer you. Get on with it and move on.

Reduce- Unfortunately the industry has been rewarding quantity more than quality. Even more unfortunately, bad work has a greater impact than good, and its impact is not of the positive sort. Very little can prosper in an environment of poor attention, limited commitment, or fractured focus. I don’t know anyone who doesn’t have too much to do already (and less money or time to do it in than previously). We could all gain by slowing down and doing less but doing that thing we do better. We have to. The independent sector doesn’t have the money to fool people to think that their mediocre work should be seen. More work needs to go into both making our films better and into how to reach and engage with our audiences in more rewarding way. Unless a filmmaker can demonstrate both of those qualities, they shouldn’t be shooting their film. Failure in either department brings all of us down with it. We are all connected and only the best work lifts us (don’t get me wrong, we can’t have gate keepers determining what or who “is ready” to make a film — we just have to be more demanding on ourselves).

Participate – You have something to say, so say it. Others are saying the things you believe, so let it be known. Your skill set and experience are both unique to you, but others would benefit from the gift of your engagement, so why not get something done now, even if it is not what you ultimately are striving for. We don’t have time to be silent. Speak up not just about what you know or feel, but what you want to know or feel. If you care about something, write in, or send a proxy. Encourage others to do the same too. The world will change for the worse unless you engage.

Collaborate – We learn more when we break our normal routine and do something different, be it a different task, or a different situation, or a different sort of creation. There are times to lead and times to follow. We learn from those that see differently than us. We understand and process things better when it involves others we care about. There is also no denying that there is so much change both needed and occurring that we can’t possibly gain by working alone. If you haven’t realized that you can’t possibly get it done alone anymore, you haven’t engaged. Filmmaking and it’s secondary necessities of marketing and distribution can’t be the work of a singular auteur anymore — cinema requires that you (to borrow IndieGoGo’s mantra) Do It With Others.

Go To The Crowd – We need our work to have greater reach. At some point in the process, we need to engage and encourage everyone out there to determine something about the work. This makes them stakeholders in the process and cements a deeper relationship with you. Both CrowdSourcing and CrowdFunding are marvelous endeavors, not just for what the immediate product they bring, but for the engagement they deliver. Don’t get me wrong, there are inefficiencies in many approaches and in reaching out we need to offer meaningful ways for people to engage, and reasons for them to remain. Today’s collaboration is not just about working with those you know, but also those that you don’t and won’t ever know.

Question- I find the obvious is often ignored by the status quo. Whether it was making movies for six figures, creating a producer-driven company, starting an international sales company & licensing our own films, cutting digitally, shooting video and transferring to film, or the actions I currently contemplate, I have found resistance from the mainstream to adopt new behavior that might be game-changing. Culturally, we’ve all been seduced by security and knowledge, but it is risk and exploration of the unknown that usually moves us forward.

Keep It Human & Personable- It is sooo hard to get a movie made. It is soooo hard to write a decent script. It is soooo hard to find a way to make a living and to be engaged in the creative arts. Anyone that does any of these things is a hero to me. Good fortune is rare, but it is needed for most to obtain the life they want. It may take something that resembles an army to make a movie, promote it, and get it seen, but those engaged in the process are usually operating out of some aspect of love, and need acknowledgement. What’s with all the ego that swims through this business?

Reward- If you are trying to make movies, or already working in the film business, you have too much on your plate; if you are able to do good work, help those around you, or just make stuff happen, you are probably super human. If someone around you is doing this kind of stuff, show your appreciation. When I get a note from someone that they liked my film, it makes my day. When someone has tried to help me without any personal gain on their part, I think the world may actually be an alright place. When someone indicates that they know what I do and they treat it with all due respect, I think we might just get out of this situation somewhat intact. Vote for the world you want with your actions and appreciation.

Make It All One Ongoing Conversation – We squander our efforts when we think only about the single project at hand. It is not about just getting that one movie done. We have to keep moving the conversation forward. We have to engage with our community in such a meaningful way that they will be motivated to move with us to the next project too. Don’t reinvent the wheel each time, but if you have invested the time to seed an audience, feed them and breed them; bring them with you to all that you are doing. Help them understand why X eventually follows A. Keep them engaged. Keep them loyal.

And you thought you didn’t have enough to do today!

  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • Joanne Feinberg
    Just got to read your "18 Actions" Ted, and very glad I did. So much to consider here, and the list could really be titled "18 Actions Towards A Sustainable Truly Free CREATIVE Community" as it applies to many endeavors. But our film universe IS in need of change, so the focus is appropriate! At the moment the element "Reduce" is making a lot of sense to me, and especially that "We could all gain by slowing down and doing less but doing that thing we do better."
    I'll be writing a blog post for our festival shortly. Will definitely link to this blog and help spread the word. Thanks Ted!
  • Scilla Andreen
    Thank you Ted Hope, as in Hope that conjures up a future of good things happening; forward thinking and forward motion. I loved the 18 Actions List.
  • Mike
    Loved this post. I read it about a week ago and it's been on my mind off and on since.
  • Anonymous
    Ok- here is one of the issues that I find time consuming and counter to Ted's cogent and seasoned thinking: The lawyers- I have been production counsel on many movies- often low budget. There are lawyers that take 4 months to close a deal- list requirements for their talent (often actors' reps) who cite every amenity as deal breakers, who want perk packages, (special make-up artists, personal assistants, approvals over casting, etc.) all requiring weeks of getting to a place that is realistic for a particular production- I don't even think their clients know how ridiculous certain requests are --When I grew up in this business I thought independent films -low budget films- could be papered by deal memos- the deal memos are now pages long because everyone thinks the other is going to screw the other and then some--Get rid of the producers that screw the actors (and other talent) and get rid of the lawyers who are tedious, unproductive and kill the spirit of making an indy film- or alternatively don't use actors whose representatives don't know the art of a deal and make sure the actors get appropriate feed back - also I have done deals on behalf of talent with indy producers who refuse to give actors, directors or writers a piece of the real pie if the film is successful-- particularly when there is no real money upfront-
  • The Sujewa
    Hey David from biracy.com,

    I started replying to your post & then it grew into a comment that was longer than 4,096 characters & thus could not post here, thus had to post it at my blog:

    http://diyfilmmaker.blogspot.c...

    Basically it is a rough plan to create a distro company that would have $1 Mil gross revenue that serves 1,000 indie filmmakers/1,000 real indie feature projects a year ($10K+ budget indie features). Check it out all interested.

    - Sujewa
  • Lux
    Great stuff Ted. It's good to find your blog.

    Lux
  • david
    Sujewa,

    Interesting facts about the numbers of films and the cost per budget on these indies. If you simply charged users a 100 dollar fee for an all access pass to consume as many of these films as they wanted to you could provide upside to all filmmakers, administer the network and use some of the proceeds for handling submissions, festival acquisitions and curating costs.

    The question was put to me last week about our model by Ted himself on how to handle large bodies of work and i do think that there is a workable solution here providing that the numbers of these films are not all over the map and that films that cost 10K are given the same rights as a film that costs 25K.

    hmmmmm....i'd say with confidence that we could demonstrate a model for this....that works...in about 8 weeks time if there was other interest from film people on this site to assist in the compiling of films that are distressed and without homes. I think 100 films would be a good starting point, so that people are buying the right to watch these films at a buck a film.

    Please let me know if this interests anyone on this site.

    Thanks

    david
    Founder
    www.biracy.com
  • The Sujewa
    The $5 Million A Year Challenge:

    http://diyfilmmaker.blogspot.c...

    'cause I think ultimately the distribution, marketing, & making money back problems that real indies face now (or have always faced, more pronouned now) can probably be better solved through a capitalist/market driven/competitive approach (the same kind of approach that created Hollywood & the indie film biz - as i understand it) where individual ego, greed, talent, & drive can be rewarded. Rather than through a super gigantic non-profit association (of course i can definitely be wrong on this one, this is just what i see now, based on past behavior of indie filmmakers).
  • The Sujewa
    Lunchpail (must visit your blog & get your real name :),

    Re: a big sweeping initiative to monetize indie film - sounds like a Marshall Plan for indies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.... So, if a lot of $s have to be raised for this, it'll need a good business plan & info on how investors will make $s. Could work I guess, I think the Marshall Plan was a success & US gov got the $s paid back, & of course created good trading partners & allies for ourselves.

    - S
  • The Sujewa
    Hopefully the "information needs to be free" idea will go away when it comes to art/entertainment. I don't think it will work too well - sounds a little bit like socialist economic policies/goals (granted, i am no expert on socialism or economic policies, i do know that they didn't work, & now those economies are part capitalist/market & price competition driven or are trying to become so) - in that if things (entertainment) are available for free & it is very difficult to make money from those things then there is less incentive for investors to invest in entertainment production & distribution (or for artists to dedicate a lot of time to create & sell art/entertainment products, since time - at some point - = money). Maybe we'll just end up with 2 kinds of entertainment - the free kind made & distributed by people who have not figured out how to get paid for it (yet?), & others made by pros who charge for their products & get paid to make & distribute it. Resist Free baby :) - if it's possible/not too late.

    Also, one area that some money is being spent in the real indie film world is in prodcution - 5,000 films submitted to sundance x perhaps $10,000 per project, on average, once all the bills are paid & in kind services are accounted for = $50,000,000.
    And that's just one big chunk of the $s spent on production, there are other projects that get made every year too. So, if a reliable distribution route is invented, I bet a lot of these indie filmmakers may spend a little bit more money to make sure their finished films are available to customers - so - a possible source of revene there for an indie filmmakers association - in making sure indie films get distributed/are made available for purchase/view & are marketed/advertised to some degree (maybe that's one of the services the association can provide as a part of membership, or for a fee, & through which can generate revenue for other work, etc.).

    - Sujewa
  • lunchpail
    Thanks for the comments and I really appreciate you posting the Calvin teaser on your blog Sujewa, which is a great example of Ted's action #8 above.

    I agree an Association like I'm suggesting seems destined to fail without great leadership. (and $$$)

    But without something broad and sweeping, each indie will continue to be an island. How many films are for sale at Toronto? How much better would it be if each of those "independent films" were created within a (more) ethical system that not only protected them from financial ruin but gave them a chance to find an audience and make even a small profit?

    Eventually, the distribution and monetizing problems will be solved. But then I see the industry returning to its roots -- an inefficient kind of natural selection -- a hierarchy of individuals fighting it out and finding their place, but not necessarily producing the best movies in the end.

    Maybe that's America and how it should be. I don't think so, but unless something BIGGER comes along to organize the industry beyond the limitations of Sundance and IFP, it's what we'll be stuck with.

    I find these 18 actions inspiring and hope someday they will be the norm. But it will be difficult for them to take root in this cut-throat system we've inherited, especially with so much money on the line.
  • david geertz
    hmmmm.....anytime I hear the word association i am immediately standoffish as I assume there are controlling bodies, dues, fees, and insider negotiating. look at the deal with the NHL and Blackberry Jim at the moment. How is that a fair deal. The NHL commissioner is a bully and he is trying to enforce rules on an individual and a community of fans that want to buy the team.

    I think if people remove distribution from the equation and come at the new world of film with one question: Where is the money going to come from? That will answer and solve a lot of questions and provide creative people with the resources to build projects, pay cast and crew a fair living wage and then move on to the next project.

    We're doing this by creating our own online crowdfunded cooperative where members are fans and they help fund and fractionally own the film along with the filmmaker. Each film is a unique coop under our structure so that fans need only engage with projects that wish to support.

    As we move deeper into the information economy and people demand that information be free (a statement that is now destroying companies) we need to realize that in order for it be freely distributed, that it still needs to be developed, and manufactured, and those industry subsets still cost money.

    Ted...great post by the way...as per normal.

    cheers
    dave
  • The Sujewa
    Hey Lunchpail,

    Saw the Calvin Marshall teaser, looks good (mentioned it at my blog diyfilmmaker). Congrats.

    About the "indie film basketball leage" idea - it taking deep pockets may be a problem at first. Perhaps the project needs to start small (and if it works well at that level may be easier to attract money to it) - maybe at first an alliance of indie filmmakers/companies from around the country, some projects to work on, & then formalizing the structure, figuring out how new talent will be incorporated into it, how all the members can benefit from working together instead of competing with each other (maybe limited competition built on coorperation?), etc. One possible way to go is to create such alliances for various cities first (like NYC indie filmmakers, Chicago indie filmmakers, etc.) & then bring those together for various production & distribution projects - & maybe at the end of the year a party or an award ceremony or something. Two things will have to be safeguarded - the openness of indie film - what's attractive about it is that anyone can get started in it. Another thing to get away from would be giving out prizes for best whatever project (or if that were to happen, the judges should come from completely outside the organization - will eliminate unnecessary competition & ill feelings among the members of the org). Since art/entertainment is not sports & theoratically every project can win (make its money back & or find its audience) that should be the aim instead of figuring out which film is "better" (which is a ridiculous notion since excellence in art/entertainment is a matter of taste - or - since both a Hi8 shot no budget indie comedy such as Scumrock & a 35 or 70 mm big budget extravaganca (sp?) such as Saving Private Ryan can both be good - based on what you like). But having some kind of a structure - like the NBA - could help indie filmmakers.

    - Sujewa
  • anita tovich
    My Producing students will be starting class on Monday w/Ted's initial 10 points and going from there. Every day I walk into classrooms of directors, producers, cinematographers,and journalists w/my mantra. "If you don't save independent Film,independent film will not save you." "Community, community, community" So far they're listening. If they don't listen, I'm gonna tell them I'm gonna cry-cause I am.
  • lunchpail
    Yes, Sujewa, I remember when Madstone and Indigent started out and felt optimistic about the potential of new indie models emerging and succeeding.

    But those efforts were, in the end, about a small group of producers/filmmakers. Indigent made approximately a dozen small but excellent DV movies over five or six years if I recall.

    I'm envisioning something much bigger in terms of structure.

    "Bigger" doesn't seem like the right answer at this point in history...however...in order to organize and have economic structure around the "independent film industry" my guess is that it will take some very special people to lead with an innovative, efficient model. Not to mention some very deep pockets.

    Otherwise, we'll continue to exist as individual companies ultimately out for their own success and interests.

    Sure, supportive partnerships in the trenches will exist between entities and be critical on some level -- but more often they will be platonic at best.

    Imagine with me the independent film industry masquerading as the NBA for a moment....

    30 regional (franchises) companies (each independently owned and financed) out there developing and making movies on their own.

    But here's the rub -- all of them are bound by an association. A powerful governing body with rules, regulations and revenue sharing. An association that works together utilizing smart business and distribution tactics and ethical ideals (like Ted's list) so that all can have the best possible critical and financial success.

    I'm probably dreaming but it somehow makes sense to me.

    Would appreciate someone posting on why this could never work.
  • Slava Rubin
    Ted,

    Great stuff. Thanks for the Do It With Others shoutout. It takes time to make change, but its great to have you leading the charge.

    Slava
  • The Sujewa
    Lunchpail,

    Something a tiny bit like what you are describing was, I think, tried by Madstone Films (i think they hired like 5 filmmakers for 1 year to write & make their debut features, or something like that). I don't think that experiment was a success. But of course that does not mean such a thing should not be tried again.

    Another little project that I liked was InDigEnt - they made over a dozen DV movies for $100K or less each. I remember reading that some of those projects made money (or, at least, people who worked on them got paid). So, maybe that's one example of a possible group, low budget venture having some success.

    - Sujewa
  • lunchpail
    Thanks for the list. A DIWO model feels challenging because every indie right now is like an orphan on the street fighting for its life. It's more difficult to be altruistic when there's a constant struggle to promote your film and pay bills.

    If we really want the industry to adopt these kinds of ideals and become unified and successful -- it will need a sustainable economic structure that invites this behavior.

    This might sound ridiculous and naive at first but perhaps the industry, in a perfect world, would be loosely modeled after a privately held professional sports association with rules and revenue sharing. An association that shares the above list of ideals.

    Each franchise would be like a mini-major, if you will, competing against each other for talent, scripts, fans, box office and awards.

    A draft would be held every year. There would be developmental leagues where young filmmakers could draw a living wage while developing and making films on a small scale. These films could be riskier and cheaper by nature.

    Gradually, filmmakers would climb the ladder with the goal of advancing to the highest/broadest level of independent filmmaking.

    Not only would a system like this be more transparent, but the wealth would be spread around more evenly. Film jobs would become steady and stable and better films would probably get made. Certainly a wider variety.

    Maybe I'm crazy but as Ted says above -- the fact no one knows anything has never been more true.

    I hate to sound too cynical, but as long as there is no structure, everyone will continue to scramble in all different directions in order to protect themselves and their own careers.
  • The Sujewa
    Hey Ted,

    Good ideas. But I think for most filmmakers - indie & otherwise - there is no "we" - just themselves & maybe a small, close group of friends & everyone else is competition. Anyway, let's hope things change.

    - Sujewa
  • Dan Cogan
    Ted, I love how mad (in both senses of the word) you have become! You're absolutely right. And you're a great standard-bearer. Onwards!
  • Sheri Candler
    Here, here on these points. Especially championing films that deserve recognition and collaborating with others.

    My network is every one's network. I get as much satisfaction out of putting two people together who can create something spectacular as I do by finding someone I can do spectacular things with. Too bad every one in this business doesn't feel that way. Go Ted! Go Indie filmmakers!
blog comments powered by Disqus

This site could not have been built without the help and insight of Michael Morgenstern. My thanks go out to him.

Help save indie film and give this guy a job in web design or film!